The Philatelist
Indian States 6 min read

Charkhari’s Pictorials of 1931: a City in Miniature

The nine-value pictorial set of 1931 showing Charkhari’s lake, palaces, fort and temples: Batliboi proofs, inverted centres, cancelled-to-order sets and evidence of real use.

Jaspreet Kaur

Updated June 28, 2026

Charkhari one-anna Imlia Palace pictorial stamp, 1931 issue family
In this article

The set

The pictorials of 1931 take the collector on a tour of the state: a lake, Imlia Palace, an industrial school, a view of the city, the fort, a guest house, a palace gate and two temples. The nine values are half, one, two, four and eight annas, and one, two, three and five rupees. The catalogue lists the set from 25 June 1931; another date of 23 June is also given, and the conflict is unresolved.[9][3][5]

One anna Imlia Palace, from the pictorial set of 1931. Post of Charkhari, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).
One anna Imlia Palace, from the pictorial set of 1931. Post of Charkhari, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain).

Who made them

Auction records give leads: a marginal block with a partial Batliboi imprint (Feldman, 2024), four brown designs together with a separate 1 ANNA surcharge (Feldman, 2025), and a four-anna proof in red or rose with a broad blank surround, reported to carry BLW on the back (Stanley Gibbons Baldwin’s, November 2026). They connect the production with Batliboi Litho Works, but name no artist, engraver or official who commissioned the designs, and the decisive imprint and back are not visible in the published pictures.[24][26][25]

Inverted and displaced centres

Stoney’s study of 1937 separates inverted centres, doubled centres, displaced centres and offsets on the backs of the pictorials, and reports three-rupee tête-bêche pairs in two arrangements. These are different faults, not names for the same one. He also describes a repaired handstamp, which shows why apparent design differences need checking for physical alteration.[29]

In the five-rupee multiple below, compare the direction of the building with the frame lettering on each stamp; the same relationship repeats through the block. It is a variety of the five rupees, not another value.[15]

Five rupees pictorial multiple with the central building inverted in its frame, attributed to SG 53b. The photograph is
Five rupees pictorial multiple with the central building inverted in its frame, attributed to SG 53b. The photograph is sideways as supplied; the inversion is within each stamp. Burda Auction 59.

Cancelled to order

Klaseboer warns that many pictorials were cancelled to order. A dated strike on a loose stamp is weak evidence of a journey compared with a whole cover whose origin, address and transit marks agree.[3]

A letter printed in The Stamp Lover in October 1933, written from Ahmednagar, describes complete used sets on the market at low prices. The writer had asked the state Postmaster-General about cancelled-to-order stamps and about getting examples on original covers; the reply offered pictorials at face value but named no local dealer in used stamps. The exchange shows the concern of the time; it does not prove who cancelled every set. Keep a cover’s address, dates and transit marks with the stamp.[11]

Did the high values reach the post offices?

Stoney reported that the low pictorial values reached post offices but believed the high values did not. He also described a period when they were used for judicial revenue, later prohibited by the Judicial Minister. His account of a black half anna on thin pelure paper is equally careful: he had been assured it was used but had not seen a used copy. These are his reports, not proof that every high value is non-postal.[23]

The end of the state stamps

On 13 March 1948 Charkhari was among the 35 states of Bundelkhand and Baghelkhand that agreed to unite, and the covenant forming Vindhya Pradesh was signed on 18 March 1948, ending the state as a separate administration. The Smithsonian dates the replacement of state stamps by Indian stamps to 1 May 1950.[6]

People and the limits of attribution

The sources name custodians, commissioners, informants, collectors and institutions far more readily than the makers of the stamps. No individual designer or engraver of any Charkhari stamp is known.

Person or institutionRole in the sources
The MaharajaKept the early steel die in his personal custody (Douie); not its designer or engraver
C. L. PigottSupplied the notes and specimens for the March 1897 account, quoted by Douie and Evans
Major EvansPhilatelic author; passed on Pigott’s account and the Satwara cover
F. M. DouieSpecialist collector and author of the 1935 study of sheets and settings
Unnamed draughtsmenSuggested by Douie from differences in the hand-drawn values; names unknown
Jujhar SinghOrdered the crossed-swords stamps and the emergency handstamp (Röver)
Unnamed Calcutta firmPrinter of the crossed-swords stamps (Röver); name unknown
Arimardan SinghRuler under whom unused and cancelled-to-order sales grew after 1924 (Röver)
John Haddon & Co.Name in a commercial paper watermark (Benders); papermaker, not printer
State PressPrinted the 1930 typography and the 1940 surcharges
Batliboi Litho WorksLinked to the 1931 pictorials by auction descriptions of an imprint and BLW on a proof
Dewan, Political Agent, Sir Arthur LothianPassed the 1939 shortage account to Stoney in 1944
R. F. StoneyResearcher of 1937 and 1944
G. G. Field, I.P.Informant and collector; bought from the State Treasury in 1941
E. Franklin DeSouzaSought the Inspector’s confirmation of the manuscript provisionals
Inspector of State Post OfficesReplied on 11 February 1936; name unknown
P. N. deSouzaCollector who supplied the 1922 blocks; not the same person as E. Franklin DeSouza
Whitfield King & Co.Supplied stamps to The Postage Stamp in 1909
C. Stewart-WilsonShowed the first specimens to the journal in January 1897
Who did what, as far as the sources show.[12][7][1][22][23][24][25][29][21][4][16]

What remains to be established

A dated table of postal rates, a complete census of offices and postmarks, and the full sequence of settings still need more evidence. Covers known only from reports should be treated as reports until the originals are seen. A 1933 census map of the Bundelkhand states, once available on Wikimedia Commons, was deleted there on 8 November 2026 for missing licence information.[30]

Sources

Notes 0

Add what you know: a cover or stamp in your collection, a date or source, a correction or a question.

No notes yet.

Notes show straight away. Keep them kind and about the article; anyone can report one that isn't. House rules

Catalogue Community Learn Shop Sign in