The Philatelist
Indian States 5 min read

Sirmoor’s Elephant and New Portrait Stamps, 1895–1899

Waterlow’s recess-printed elephant stamps of 1895–99, the 1899 portrait whose sitter is still disputed, the Waterlow archive proofs, fiscal use and the three-pies postcard.

Jaspreet Kaur

Updated May 22, 2026

Sirmoor three-pies elephant stamp, orange, from the nineteenth-century elephant family
In this article

In the 1890s Sirmoor’s stamps changed from lithographs to engraved, recess-printed designs from Waterlow: first an elephant, then a new portrait.

Two dated reports of the elephants

In March 1895 The Philatelic Record reported the three pies, six pies, one anna and two annas elephant stamps; its April follow-up described their inscriptions and reported perforation 15. In April 1899 it recorded the three annas, four annas, eight annas and one rupee elephants, sent by Whitfield, King & Co. These are dates when the stamps were reported, not first days of sale. Other catalogues date the elephants from 1894; Dawson corrected his own period to 1895–99. The high elephant values are not the later portrait stamps of the same values.[28][29][2]

Three pies orange elephant stamp. Evert Klaseboer’s online catalogue.
Three pies orange elephant stamp. Evert Klaseboer’s online catalogue.
One anna elephant. W. Michael Adkins, Sirmoor album, 2012.
One anna elephant. W. Michael Adkins, Sirmoor album, 2012.

Recess printing and re-entries

Unlike the lithographed older portraits, the elephant and the 1899 portrait were recess printed by Waterlow. Dawson records seven re-entries on the one-anna elephant and one on the two annas, which is not a census of every plate position.[4][17]

Proofs and the Waterlow archive

Grosvenor records perforated Waterlow proof sheets of 70 for the three pies, six pies, one anna and two annas elephant, with dates and quantities pencilled in the margins, and an issued one-anna sheet with minor re-entries. Spink records a bistre die proof of the three pies with a Waterlow specimen imprint. These establish production at the level of the firm; naming the designer or engraver would need signed artwork, a die register or a job sheet.[18][19][17]

Punched corner blocks from the Waterlow archive are another category. The auctioned lots are described as proofs, with security holes and staining, and the pictures show only selected high values from larger holdings. They are useful for comparing designs but are not ordinary issued stamps. The green one-anna receipt stamp from the same archive is a fiscal design.[8][9]

Elephant corner block with security punches, from the Waterlow archive. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auction, 7 March 2011, l
Elephant corner block with security punches, from the Waterlow archive. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auction, 7 March 2011, lot 1570; compare Köhler lot 11129.
Green one-anna receipt stamp corner block with security punches, from the Waterlow archive: a fiscal design. Christoph G
Green one-anna receipt stamp corner block with security punches, from the Waterlow archive: a fiscal design. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auction, 7 March 2011, lot 1572.

Postage stamps on fiscal documents

A photographed document carries two-annas elephant stamps cancelled by pen strokes and punch holes. It shows the issued design and value in fiscal use; it is not a postal cover and gives no postal rate.[8]

Fiscal document with fifteen two-annas elephant stamps, cancelled by pen and punch holes. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auctio
Fiscal document with fifteen two-annas elephant stamps, cancelled by pen and punch holes. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auction, 7 March 2011, lot 1566.

The new portrait of 1899: whose face?

The new portrait set has four values starting at three annas, as listed by StampWorld and Feldman: three annas, four annas, eight annas and one rupee. Grosvenor attributes the portrait to Surendar Bikram Parkash, who reigned in 1899; StampWorld’s heading names Shamsher Parkash. Until the design correspondence or a captioned Waterlow record turns up, “New portrait” is the safer name.[18][16][17]

A report of the time complicates it further. In May 1906 the Philatelic Journal of Great Britain quoted C. A. Howes, who was himself citing the Philatelic Journal of India: the State had meant to keep the late Raja’s head and did not recognise Waterlow’s portrait as anyone in particular. It is reported testimony, not the original instructions, but it warns against naming the full-face sitter only from the new ruler’s accession.[30]

Three annas new portrait. The new portrait is a different design from the elephant three annas of the same value. W. Mic
Three annas new portrait. The new portrait is a different design from the elephant three annas of the same value. W. Michael Adkins, Sirmoor album, 2012.
One rupee new portrait corner block with a security punch in each stamp, classified as Waterlow proofs. Christoph Gärtne
One rupee new portrait corner block with a security punch in each stamp, classified as Waterlow proofs. Christoph Gärtner, 17th auction, 7 March 2011, lot 1571; compare Köhler lot 11130.

The green three-pies postcard

Sirmoor’s postal stationery includes a green three-pies postcard described by Dawson. Its printed stamp is not the lithographed adhesive design: the card has an ornamental border, the state arms and English inscriptions, with Waterlow’s imprint at the foot. Dawson records an unused card and one he considered genuinely used from Pachhao post office on 28 April, in a year he could not read. That is a reported use, not a first day of issue; no year is supplied here by guesswork, and no picture of a card has yet been found.[4]

Sources

Notes 0

Add what you know: a cover or stamp in your collection, a date or source, a correction or a question.

No notes yet.

Notes show straight away. Keep them kind and about the article; anyone can report one that isn't. House rules

Catalogue Community Learn Shop Sign in